<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bono:  &#8216;The semi-official position of Cheeky Representative of A Lot of People in Africa.&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://www.blacklooks.org/2007/06/bono_the_semi-official_position_of_cheeky_representative_of_a_lot_of_people_in_africa.html</link>
	<description>black looks</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Changeseeker</title>
		<link>http://www.blacklooks.org/2007/06/bono_the_semi-official_position_of_cheeky_representative_of_a_lot_of_people_in_africa.html#comment-52911</link>
		<author>Changeseeker</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blacklooks.org/2007/06/bono_the_semi-official_position_of_cheeky_representative_of_a_lot_of_people_in_africa.html#comment-52911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"The agency of many Africans is suppressed because people like Bono decide to marginalize these voices. Instead of challenging the power dynamic that relegates the voices of Africans to the periphery, he jumps right into the power mix and reifies this relationship and then pronounces that Africans have no voice as if he is disconnected from this reality."&lt;/i&gt;

Precisely!  And he wouldn't understand this, even if he read this post (and Sokari's earlier one).  The romanticization of Africa and the White supremacist perspective that Africans (and those in the diaspora) &lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; to be taken care of are the same two-pronged approaches that have been SO long in place.  Of &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;course&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, the G-8 leaders are going to welcome Bono as "spokesperson for Africa" with open arms!  Otherwise, they might, in fact, have to speak with Africans -- a MUCH different dialogue, I dare say.  But sitting down with Bono allows them to &lt;i&gt;pretend&lt;/i&gt; they care, without actually having to face reality or lose their sense of superiority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The agency of many Africans is suppressed because people like Bono decide to marginalize these voices. Instead of challenging the power dynamic that relegates the voices of Africans to the periphery, he jumps right into the power mix and reifies this relationship and then pronounces that Africans have no voice as if he is disconnected from this reality.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Precisely!  And he wouldn&#8217;t understand this, even if he read this post (and Sokari&#8217;s earlier one).  The romanticization of Africa and the White supremacist perspective that Africans (and those in the diaspora) <i>need</i> to be taken care of are the same two-pronged approaches that have been SO long in place.  Of <b><i>course</i></b>, the G-8 leaders are going to welcome Bono as &#8220;spokesperson for Africa&#8221; with open arms!  Otherwise, they might, in fact, have to speak with Africans &#8212; a MUCH different dialogue, I dare say.  But sitting down with Bono allows them to <i>pretend</i> they care, without actually having to face reality or lose their sense of superiority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lova</title>
		<link>http://www.blacklooks.org/2007/06/bono_the_semi-official_position_of_cheeky_representative_of_a_lot_of_people_in_africa.html#comment-52794</link>
		<author>lova</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blacklooks.org/2007/06/bono_the_semi-official_position_of_cheeky_representative_of_a_lot_of_people_in_africa.html#comment-52794</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this great follow-up article: 
" I think such an appellation is too easy, hastily obscures some realities and segregates Bono’s actions from the larger picture." 
This sentence is key to me. The critiques of Bono's approach are spot-on. 
Now, what if Bono is removed from the picture ? Would the gains outweigh the loss ? 
I  believe that despite all his grandiose posturing and  egocentric self-perception, Bono should be recognized as a connector (As Gladwell's defines it in the Tipping point). It is when he tries to be a maven that he lost his way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this great follow-up article:<br />
&#8221; I think such an appellation is too easy, hastily obscures some realities and segregates Bono’s actions from the larger picture.&#8221;<br />
This sentence is key to me. The critiques of Bono&#8217;s approach are spot-on.<br />
Now, what if Bono is removed from the picture ? Would the gains outweigh the loss ?<br />
I  believe that despite all his grandiose posturing and  egocentric self-perception, Bono should be recognized as a connector (As Gladwell&#8217;s defines it in the Tipping point). It is when he tries to be a maven that he lost his way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
