Home > Racism > “anonymous on “You are a black man – you have to leave”

“anonymous on “You are a black man – you have to leave”

November 22nd, 2006 Sokari

I woke up this morning to read the following comment on the post “You are a Black man you have to leave”

THIS IS NOT AN INCIDENT OF RACISM. As an employee of the spoken restaurant I am appalled that this can even be considered an incident of racism. This is San Francisco, a city with the worst homelessness problem in the nation. Daily we have people from the street wander in and disrupt service. Crack addicts, prostitutes, etc. disturb people who are paying good money to eat and stay here. Constantly we have to escort disgusting trashy people from our restuarant on the embarcadero in order to ensure a sense of security amongst out guests. It does not matter whether you are black white pink or blue, if you come into our restaurant reeking of body odor, adorning dreadlocks, and wearing filthy clothes, you run the rist of being escorted from any fine dining establishment. Any restaurant in the state of california reserves the right to refuse service to ANYONE. Service was refused to this man based on his appearance not his race. If anyone has strong enough evidence than I to contest this statement I would like to know. We are a tolerant community and a diversely employed restaurant, how dare you try to bring down our good name for an issue that has been dead for years.

I am appalled with this response. The comment totally contradicts the offfical reponse of the hotel by the CEO as posted in Naijablog.

Prejudice still exists in America. It is real and palpable. While we’ve all witnessed superficial changes in America over the past four decades, the reality is that people “pre-judge” each other way too much, whether it’s based upon skin color, religion, sexual orientation, age, economic status, or some other factor that makes one “the other.”

Obviously the so called “diversity” training has not impacted on this employee who by his words does not agree with the CEO that this was a racist incident. Instead he claims the Professor was removed because he “appeared” in such a way that he was associated with the following: “crack addict, prostitute, disgusting dirty people,reeking of body odor, adorning dreadlocks, and wearing filthy clothes”

The most significant aspects about this comment are first that he denies that racism exists yet his statement is so loaded with prejudice and discrimination not to talk of lack of humanity. Secondly is his more emotional reaction which is the manifestion of his attitude towards other human beings and basically boils down to making judgements about people which includes one’s skin colour and any other “visible statement of difference” because that is what this is about. It’s about not respecting and accepting difference in a land where wearing “no brand name” clothes is seen as subversive, dreadlocks as seditious and deviant and “prostitutes” sex-workers, the lowest of the low – he obviously has no thought on the punters who presumably are the “clean shaven, baldheaded, beardless, Tommy Hilfiger dressed white” acceptable guests in his hotel.

This person is clearly used to dividing the world into people who belong in this hotel and those that dont belong and in this case that includes the professor. A very respected writer, an African gentleman of a mature age and someone who this employee will never even in his dreams reach in terms of humanity and richness of mind.

I am sending this comment to all those listed on the original comments including the CEO – with my own response – I hope others will do the same.

General Manager Hotel Vitale: David Curell: dcurell@jdvhospitality.com

Chip Conley
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
cc@jdvhospitality.com
415.248.5940

Jack Kenny
President and Chief Operating Officer
jfk@jdvhospitality.com
415.248.5958

Fred de Stefano
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
fd@jdvhospitality.com
415.248.5941

Peter Gamez
Vice President of Sales and Marketing
pg@jdvhospitality.com
415.248.5945

Jane Howard
Vice President of Employee Development
jh@jdvhospitality.com
415.773.1078

Tags:


Digg!

Sphere: Related Content

Categories: Racism Tags:
  1. November 22nd, 2006 at 14:29 | #1

    I can’t believe this response – and am behind you all the way in your response, Sokari – I couldn’t put it better. Anonymous is talking about a world famous author and trying to justify the way his treatment. There is no justification for treating people this way. Once a person who is not staying there has indicated they are not ordering something then I believe they can be asked to leave – I think if there was a doubt about the Professor being a guest then that could have been handled discreetly and gently – by the staff member discreetly enquiring with reception or asking politely for the Prof’s room number.

    The whole incident is similar to a lot of experiences that fellow Africans have had in the USA – whether it is because we look different, do we really? or because of cultural nuances in our behaviour that indicate that we are “the other”. Visiting the USA is often a traumatic experience for Africans because of the widespread racism experienced.

  2. November 22nd, 2006 at 18:03 | #2

    It appears Hotel Vitale has a huge problem on their hands. May be they need to have a notice on their dorr entrance stating their code on dress style, body odor and hair style.

    I wouldn’t worry about this comment from annonymous, obvious he/she belongs to the vast pool of the ignorant that roam about continental US thinking they are all that…!

    The problem of unwanted guests using public spaces in hotels/restaurants located in urban areas isn’t perculiar to Hotel Vitale or San F; obviously this hotel doesn’t deserve to be in business if it’s yet to devise a clear and workable strategy to deal with it.

  3. November 22nd, 2006 at 18:13 | #3

    I would worry about this comment from “anonymous”! His policy of racial profiling and prejudice cause him to treat customers of the hotel in which he works differently based on skin color, Afro-centric hairstyles, and perceived class status. He assumed, based on appearence that a highly successful black person was homeless and therefore did not belong at the hotel. Anonymous’ sentiments shape the way he treats black people (black customers). It should be reported to his superiors and his/her identity should be revealed. It’s a powerful thing to make comments under anonymous conditions. The person who made the above comment knew their statements would land them into trouble.

  4. November 22nd, 2006 at 18:24 | #4

    Imnakoya and Kym@ I wouldnt say I was “worried” more disgusted but then its not as if I dont know individuals like this one exist and more so than I would care to think about.

  5. Josef
    November 22nd, 2006 at 19:24 | #5

    As someone raised in the San Francisco, I am NOT surprised by the behavior of the employee toward the professor except for the language he used!
    Racism is still present in the so-called “most liberal” city in America. It is just more SUBTILE. You can just feel it by the sub-standard customer service when you go to a bar, restaurant, etc.. There are areas and business in the city, where they do not like to see a black person. They just do not put a “sign” in the front to save you the trouble.

    This hotel vitale place is a “boutique” hotel, chic type of a place according their website. There are certain type of people it geared for or marketed to… What is image it is trying to sell? Maybe the employee, felt the professor does not fit the image of the place?

    I am sure he tried to get rid of the professor because he was black. The only difference he was not subtle about it. I believe he decided not be subtle- because I am assuming maybe the professor had an accent and he thought “this guy is an immigrant”.. “he can’t do any harm to me” “he does not the rule”.

    I doubt it that the employee would have used that kind of language toward an African-American person but I am sure he would have tried to get rid of him.
    I saw the reply from the owner of the hotel Chip Conley about “diversity training”, “racism” training. Well, that is a little too late for the professor. They training might help in the future. But I think the best thing to do for hotel or send a message is to fire that employee. If not for his blatant racism at least for bad customer service. I thought the hotel is in the hospitality and customer service business. Well, how hospitable can you be if your employees are saying “You are a black, you have to leave”?

    I hate these empty apologies.

    In terms of treatment of African people in America, it will not never change until Africa gets organized and removes the image it has on the world stage. Most American do not know anything about geography or history outside there borders except what they see on CNN and when it comes to Africa it is like darfur, etc.. that is the only Africa they know.

  6. sandra
    November 22nd, 2006 at 19:51 | #6

    Why didn’t the hotel worker just ask if the Professor was a guest at the hotel as soon as he approached the Professor? I do believe this happens more often than we think–or will ever know.

  7. November 23rd, 2006 at 00:35 | #7

    I agree. It’s sad that no matter who a black person becomes, whether a professor, a doctor, an ambassador, or whatever, we still cannot get past the negative ideas about the thin layer of skin. It’s such a strange complex.

  8. November 23rd, 2006 at 03:44 | #8

    Sure, homelessness is a big problem in San Francisco, as it is in multiple big cities around the world. Yet, anyone who works in a service oriented business knows you’ll come in contact with people who span the entire socio-economic, racial, and political scale. One’s race is definitely part of one’s appearance. Sure, one may be uncomfortable serving a person but this does not justify treating anyone inhumanely. This incident is a big insult to all of us.

  9. November 23rd, 2006 at 06:45 | #9

    Sokari,

    Thank you, I think it’s great that you took it on yourself to hightlight the issue. The recent Michael Richard’s “coming out” as a racist showed that racism is far from extinct in America.

    On the other hand, the “anonymous” comment could have been made by anyone, even someone who isn’t from the hotel. If the hotel agreed to a public apology and better diversity training, particularly from senior management, then we shouldn’t worry about an “anonymous” commentor.

  10. Sokari
    November 23rd, 2006 at 09:29 | #10

    Abdurahman@ Thanks I dont know about the “Coming Out” or who is Michael Richards but will check online. Yes I had thought about the anon being anyone from the hotel or elsewhere. Whoever he was his lack of humanity, racism and whole tone was vile.

  11. November 23rd, 2006 at 09:32 | #11

    Thank you for that post.

    Racism is the main way people are divided in this society.

    San Francisco housing is ridiculously expensive. No surprise that homelessness is so high.

    At Silicon Valley, if you make $75,000/yr, you’d probably live in a shelter.

  12. November 23rd, 2006 at 11:11 | #12

    Micheal Richards is the actor who played Kramer in Seinfeld. Here is a video of what happened:
    http://www3.youtube.com/watch?v=LgHj_YxyhGc

    And here is the video of his “apology” on Letterman’s show:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HC3nqiK785U&eurl=

    This is worse than anything I’ve seen lately, it goes along way to show that racism is much bigger in the US. It wasn’t just a mistake, he went for minutes to describe how black were and “should be” treated in his opinion just 50 years ago.

  13. November 24th, 2006 at 14:09 | #13

    I wouldn’t worry about this comment from annonymous, obvious he/she belongs to the vast pool of the ignorant that roam about continental US thinking they are all that…!

    This made me laugh out loud. So true!

    Cities in the northern and western part of the U.S. remain in many ways untouched by anti-racism work. The anti-racist work that exists in the u.s. remains marginalized.

  14. Sokari
    November 24th, 2006 at 14:20 | #14

    Abdulrahman@ God – well we always knew that this is really what lies beneath the surface of much of white america.

  15. why only blacks
    November 26th, 2006 at 04:19 | #15

    Talk about judging white America! I really think that this was probably just a blown up misunderstanding. I don’t react to being treated differently when I’m in different places. Myself, being a tall white woman, could have the same thing happen. However, if I were black would I have to freak out and label it racism. It seems that you’re actually going much further than this incident. Of all the blogs and different things I’ve read I feel like I should be ashamed to be white. You’re doing the same thing! Why do you automatically asume that anonymous is white. S.F. is very diverse, they could be of any ethnic origin. (I disagree with them either way)

  16. Sokari
    November 26th, 2006 at 09:44 | #16

    The incident and comment speak for themselves as for your own comment well you just buried yourself lady!

  17. Keola
    November 26th, 2006 at 14:51 | #17

    You should react to being treated differently when you are in different places, especially when you are paying the same kind of money everyone else is paying. You can’t be so ignorant not to know when someone is judging you because you are of a different race. When you, a “tall white woman” have that happen to you, come back with a solid argument.

    If you are a white person that, ignorant as it sounds, feels you are better than a non-white person, just by virtue of being white, you have every right to be ashamed of yourself. If you are not that kind of person, then you have nothing to be ashamed of.

  18. Dave
    January 19th, 2007 at 22:59 | #18

    Let’s be realistic. Of course it was a misunderstanding. The employee probably was not out to maliciously harass the Professor. I choose not to believe that, though I’m sure in some parts of the country, deliberate and calculated racism does exist.

    Nevertheless, the incident was a form of racism, or ethnic profiling, or whatever term they use to water-down what has become a less obvious, but far more pervasive force in this (Bay Area) community.

    The ‘racism’ debate needs to evolve, just as we liberal, educated, Bay Areans have evolved. We know what to say in public and how to say it. We know how to act as to make the world think ‘equality’ is as internalized as we pretend it to be. I am considerate, aware, compassionate, and yet in many ways, perhaps the most important, I am a racist.

    I make associations between socio-economic status/crime/poverty and race. It is unavoidable because it is what we see. But whereas “tall & white” feels we are “making too much of this incident,” I feel we are not making enough of this incident. We should ask ourselves why certain educational, judicial, government policies/institutions favor certain groups over others. We should ask ouselves WHY we see a more black homeless, crime, etc.

    Finally, in response to “tall & white” who “does not react to being treated differently in different places,” well, you should. As a man, I don’t think twice about walking out for a stroll at 12 or 2 AM. Do you? Privilege is often taken for granted by definition. We don’t often even know we have it, and therefore cannot empathize with those that do not. No, you shouldn’t be ashamed that you are white, but you should be aware.

Comments are closed.